Nobody could prove they had done it before
Portfolios of logos, no evidence of what changed or what it produced. What we do: we talk through your site specifically, in the first conversation, and say what we would fix first and why.
Specialist search work
The word specialist gets used loosely, and most businesses find out the difference only after a year of quiet invoices. An SEO specialist should be able to tell you what is wrong with your site, what it is worth fixing and what they would deliberately leave alone, before any contract exists.
The problem
Search has no licensing body and no barrier to entry. A person who installed a plugin last month can describe themselves as a specialist with the same confidence as someone who has spent a decade on indexation and authority, and the invoice looks identical.
The practical difference shows up when something is genuinely wrong: a migration that lost rankings, a canonical problem splitting signals, a site competing with itself across ten near-identical pages. Those problems need someone who has seen them before, and they are usually the reason a business goes looking.
Problems we see most
These are the situations that bring businesses to us, and what we do about each one.
Portfolios of logos, no evidence of what changed or what it produced. What we do: we talk through your site specifically, in the first conversation, and say what we would fix first and why.
Technical, content, local and links are four different skills. What we do: named specialists own their discipline, so depth does not depend on one person's range.
One person, one point of failure, no handover. What we do: work is documented so the reasoning survives, and cover exists when someone is unavailable.
Purchased links and spun content that a site then has to recover from. What we do: we audit what was built, identify what is risky, and replace it with authority that stands up to scrutiny.
Activity reported as effort rather than result. What we do: every piece of work states what it was meant to produce before it starts, and the report answers that question.
Technical fixes with no content, or content with no authority. What we do: we test which of the three is actually suppressing rankings rather than doing the one the last person preferred selling.
Several pages chasing the same term and none winning. What we do: we consolidate overlapping pages, establish one owner per term and redirect the rest, which often moves rankings faster than publishing anything new.
Nobody knows why anything was done. What we do: we document structure, decisions and reasoning, so the site does not become archaeology the next time it changes.
Targets get set from opinion rather than from what the businesses outranking you are publishing, ranking and earning links from. What we do: we compare visibility, content and authority against the sites actually beating you, then target that specific gap instead of a general ambition.
How we are organised
Technical SEO, content and intent, local visibility and authority building each need someone who does that thing most days. When one generalist covers all four, one of them is always the weakest, and it is usually the one your site most needs.
If you already know which single thing is holding you back, one specialist can be enough, and a diagnosis through our SEO consultant service is often the cheaper way to establish that. If several things are wrong at once, the full SEO service is the better fit.
What do you actually need?
We will say which, including when the honest answer is that you need less than you are being sold.
A migration that lost rankings, an indexation fault, a page architecture that needs rebuilding. This is narrow, technical work and it does not need a retainer.
Fix the specific fault and stop there.The usual situation: the foundation has gaps, the pages do not match demand, and the site has little authority to compete with. This needs specialists working in sequence.
Bring the disciplines together under one plan.An in-house developer and writer who could execute, with no one deciding priority. Our consultancy service exists for exactly this.
Give the team a specialist to follow.How we approach it
Specialist work should be measurable, which means the tracking has to be honest before the work starts.
Technical health, indexation, cannibalisation, demand and competitor position, with a view on which discipline is the real bottleneck.
The specialist whose discipline matches the problem, with a stated outcome and a realistic timeframe before the work begins.
Fixes, consolidation, page work and authority building, documented as they ship so the reasoning is not lost.
Reporting against the stated outcome, in enquiries and rankings, and a decision on whether to continue.
Frequently asked questions
Send us the site and describe what is not working. We will tell you which discipline the problem sits in.
Ask a specialist βAsk what they would fix first and why. A specialist talks about specific pages, indexation, search intent and competitors, and is comfortable saying what they would not do. A generalist describes services rather than diagnosing your site.
A freelancer can be excellent value for one well-defined need. A team matters when the work spans technical, content and authority at once, or when continuity must survive one person being unavailable.
What changed, what it was expected to produce and what it actually produced, in enquiries rather than impressions alone. A report that never mentions leads is not telling you whether the work is working.
Yes. We start by auditing what was done, flag anything actively risky such as purchased links or duplicate pages, and build on what is sound rather than starting from scratch.
Specialist search work
Tell us what is not working. We will tell you whether it is technical, content, authority or all three, and what it would take.